Education/Case Studies/fivecriteria/es

This page is a translated version of the page Education/Case Studies/fivecriteria and the translation is 5% complete.

Five criteria

Rochelle Davis

Assistant Professor of Anthropology

Georgetown University
EE.UU.

Nombre del curso
Introduction to the Study of the Arab World
Theorizing Culture and Politics

Nivel de curso (graduado/universitario)
M.A. and 2nd/3rd year undergraduates

Objetivos de aprendizaje
Desarrollo de habilidades para la escritura
Alfabetización de los medios de comunicación y la información
Pensamiento Crítico y Habilidades de Investigación
Colaboración
Habilidades Técnicas y de Comunicación Wiki

Disciplina del curso
Multidisciplinary

Medida de clase
20

Individual o grupo asignado
Individual

Recursos
Theorizing Culture and Politics syllabus
Theorizing Culture and Politics Wikipedia assignment
Theorizing Culture and Politics final assignment

Calificación

Students chose a topic for the semester, researched it, contributed an entry to Wikipedia, and then wrote a research paper on the same subject.

They also wrote five blog entries about their experiences over the course of the term.

I graded the assignment based on five criteria:

Vision for the entry content: Did you divide up the material in a way that reflects both the literature and neutral point of view? Did you make the appropriate headings?
Your research in thinking-beyond-Google to find relevant and diverse sources.
Your organization of the entry and the content: Did you organize the material or are there things in one section that belong elsewhere? Did you provide relevant material? Are there things missing?
Your writing of a well-supported, well-researched entry: Neutral point of view? Sources/footnotes? Grammatically correct? Paragraphs well-constructed?
How you address the comments you were given by me and others.

(CC-0) by Justin Secor